Arndt-Lappe, Sabine (2011). Towards an exemplar-based model of stress in English noun–noun compounds. JL 47. 549–585.10.1017/S0022226711000028CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arndt-Lappe, Sabine & Hedia, Sonia Ben (2019). Stress in the family: reconsidering stress preservation in English -ory adjectives. Poster presented at the 12th Mediterranean Morphology Meeting, Ljubljana, June 2019.Google Scholar

Aronoff, Mark (1976). Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bell, Melanie J. & Plag, Ingo (2012). Informativeness is a determinant of compound stress in English. JL 48. 485–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, Melanie J. & Plag, Ingo (2013). Informativity and analogy in English compound stress. Word Structure 6. 129–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ben Hedia, Sonia & Plag, Ingo (2017). Gemination and degemination in English prefixation: phonetic evidence for morphological organization. JPh 62. 34–49.Google Scholar

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo (2007). Word-final prevocalic consonants in English: representation vs. derivation. Paper presented at the 4th Old World Conference in Phonology, University of the Aegean, Rhodes, January 2007.Google Scholar

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo (2011). Cyclicity. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren D. (eds.) The Blackwell companion to phonology, volume 4. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2019–2048.Google Scholar

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo (2013). The stem-level syndrome. Paper presented at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, April 2013. Handout available online at http://bermudez-otero.com/stemlevel.pdf.Google Scholar

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo (2015). Amphichronic explanation and the life cycle of phonological processes. In Honeybone, Patrick & Salmons, Joseph (eds.) The Oxford handbook of historical phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 374–399.Google Scholar

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo (2018a). Diagnostics of the moraic trochee from Proto-Germanic to Present-Day English. Paper presented at the Workshop on the Foot in the Phonological History of English, ICEHL XX, Edinburgh, August 2018.Google Scholar

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo (2018b). Stratal phonology. In Hannahs, S. J. & Bosch, Anna R. K. (eds.) The Routledge handbook of phonological theory. Abingdon: Routledge, 100–134.Google Scholar

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo & Luís, Ana R. (2009). Cyclic domains and prosodic spans in the phonology of European Portuguese functional morphs. Paper presented at the 6th Old World Conference in Phonology, University of Edinburgh, January 2009.Google Scholar

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo & McMahon, April (2006). English phonology and morphology. In Trommer, Jochen (ed.) The handbook of English linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 382–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Booij, Geert & Rubach, Jerzy (1984). Morphological and prosodic domains in lexical phonology. Phonology 1. 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breiss, Canaan (2021). Lexical Conservatism in phonology: theory, experiments, and computational modeling. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Burzio, Luigi (1994). Principles of English stress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Collie, Sarah (2007). English stress preservation: a case for Stratal Optimality Theory. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Collie, Sarah (2008). English stress preservation: the case for ‘fake cyclicity’. English Language and Linguistics 12. 505–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dabouis, Quentin (2019). When accent preservation leads to clash. English Language and Linguistics 32. 363–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dabouis, Quentin & Fournier, Jean-Michel (2019). On the role of morphology, syllable structure, frequency and spelling in English vowel reduction. Paper presented at the 27th Manchester Phonology Meeting, June 2019.Google Scholar

Dabouis, Quentin & Fournier, Pierre (2022). English phonologies? In Arigne, Viviane & Rocq-Migette, Christiane (eds.) Modèles et modélisation en linguistique/Models and modelisation in linguistics. Brussels: Peter Lang, 215–258.Google Scholar

Dabouis, Quentin, Glain, Olivier & Navarro, Sylvain (2023). Patterns of /r/ gemination in British and American English: a comparative study. Paper presented at the 16th PAC Conference, Université Paris Nanterre, April 2023.Google Scholar

Giegerich, Heinz J. (1992). English phonology: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giegerich, Heinz J. (1999). Lexical strata in English: morphological causes, phonological effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486470CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giegerich, Heinz J. (2004). Compound or phrase? English noun-plus-noun constructions and the stress criterion. English Language and Linguistics 8. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giegerich, Heinz J. (2009). The English compound stress myth. Word Structure 2. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glain, Olivier (2012). The yod /j/: palatalise it or drop it – how traditional yod forms are disappearing from Contemporary English. Cercles 22. 4–24.Google Scholar

Glain, Olivier (2014). Introducing contemporary palatalisation. In Lee, Theodora (ed.) Proceedings of the first Postgraduate and Academic Researchers in Linguistics at York (PARLAY 2013) conference. York: York Papers in Linguistics, 16–29.Google Scholar

Halle, Morris & Mohanan, Karuvannur Puthanveettil (1985). Segmental phonology of Modern English. LI 16. 57–116.Google Scholar

Hammond, Michael (1999). The phonology of English: a prosodic Optimality-Theoretic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce (1980). A metrical theory of stress rules. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce (1982). Extrametricality and English stress. LI 13. 227–276.Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce (1995). Metrical stress theory: principles and case studies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Jensen, John T. (1993). English phonology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaye, Alan S. (2005). Gemination in English. English Today 21. 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaye, Jonathan (1995). Derivations and interfaces. In Durand, Jacques & Katamba, Francis (eds.) Frontiers of phonology. London: Longman, 289–332.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul (1982a). From cyclic to Lexical Phonology. In van der Hulst, Harry & Smith, Norval (eds.) The structure of phonological representations. Dordrecht: Foris, 131–176.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul (1982b). Lexical morphology and phonology. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.) Linguistics in the morning calm: selected papers from SICOL-1981. Seoul: Hanshin, 3–91.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul (1983). Word-formation and the lexicon. In Ingemann, Frances A. (ed.) Proceedings of the 1982 Mid-America Linguistics Conference. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas, 3–29.Google Scholar

Kraska-Szlenk, Iwona (2007). Analogy: the relation between lexicon and grammar. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar

Moore-Cantwell, Claire (2020). Weight and final vowels in the English stress system. Phonology 37. 657–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nespor, Marina & Vogel, Irene (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Oh, Eunhae (2013). Effects of boundary strength on geminate duration in English. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 19. 457–478.Google Scholar

Oh, Grace E. & Redford, Melissa A. (2012). The production and phonetic representation of fake geminates in English. JPh 40. 82–91.Google ScholarPubMed

Pater, Joe (1994). Against the underlying specification of an exceptional English stress pattern. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 13. 95–121.Google Scholar

Plag, Ingo (2010). Compound stress assignment by analogy: the constituent family bias. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 29. 243–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raffelsiefen, Renate (1999). Diagnostics for prosodic words revisited: the case of historically prefixed words in English. In Alan Hall, T. & Kleinhenz, Ursula (eds.) Studies on the phonological word. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 133–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raffelsiefen, Renate (2005). Paradigm uniformity effects versus boundary effects. In Downing, Laura J., Alan Hall, T. & Raffelsiefen, Renate (eds.) Paradigms in phonological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 211–262.Google Scholar

Raffelsiefen, Renate (2007). Morphological word structure in English and Swedish: the evidence from prosody. In Booij, Geert, Ducceschi, Luca, Fradin, Bernard, Guevara, Emiliano, Ralli, Angela & Scalise, Sergio (eds.) Proceedings of the fifth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting. Bologna: Università degli Studi di Bologna, 209–268.Google Scholar

Scheer, Tobias (2011). A guide to morphosyntax–phonology interface theories: how extra-phonological information is treated in phonology since Trubetzkoy’s Grenzsignale. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Steriade, Donca (1999). Lexical conservatism in French adjectival liaison. In Bullock, Barbara E., Authier, Jean-Marc & Reed, Lisa A. (eds.) Formal perspectives in Romance linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 243–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steriade, Donca & Stanton, Juliet (2020). Productive pseudo-cyclicity and its significance. Paper presented at LabPhon 17, Vancouver, July 2020.Google Scholar

Szigetvári, Péter (2018). Stressed schwa in English. The Even Yearbook 13. 81–95.Google Scholar

Trevian, Ives (2007). Stress-neutral endings in contemporary British English: an updated overview. Language Sciences 29. 426–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wennerstrom, Ann (1993). Focus on the prefix: evidence for word-internal prosodic words. Phonology 10. 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yu, Hye Jeong (2022). Geminate and singleton contrast in English affixed words. Phonetics and Speech Sciences 14. 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar