No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Learning biases in proper nouns
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 April 2024
Abstract
It has been proposed that there are cognitive biases in language learning that favour certain patterns over others. This study examines the effects of such bias factors on the learning of the phonology of proper nouns. I take up the phenomenon of compound voicing in Japanese surnames. The results of two judgment experiments show that, while Japanese speakers replicate various kinds of statistical regularities in existing names, they tend to extend only phonologically motivated patterns to novel names. This suggests that phonological naturalness plays a role even in the learning of a highly faithful category of words, namely proper nouns, and provides evidence for the relevance of learning biases in synchronic grammar.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Alderete, John D. & Frisch, Stefan A. (2007). Dissimilation in grammar and the lexicon. In de Lacy, Paul (ed.) The Cambridge handbook of phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 379–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asai, Atsushi (2014). Rendaku seiki no keikō to teichaku-ka [The tendency of rendaku application and its stabilization]. NINJAL Research Papers 7, 27–44.Google Scholar
Asai, Atsushi & Vance, Timothy J. (2017). Kobetsu onso to rendaku [Individual phonemes and rendaku]. In Vance et al. (2017), 47–68.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve (2015). lme4: linear mixed-effects models using ‘Eigen’ and S4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Michael, Ketrez, Nihan & Nevins, Andrew (2011). The surfeit of the stimulus: analytic biases filter lexical statistics in Turkish laryngeal alternations. Lg 87, 84–125.Google Scholar
Becker, Michael & Levine, Jonathan (2013). Experigen: an online experiment platform. Available at https://becker.phonologist.org/experigen/.Google Scholar
Becker, Michael, Nevins, Andrew & Levine, Jonathan (2012). Asymmetries in generalizing alternations to and from initial syllables. Lg 88, 232–268.Google Scholar
Beguš, Gašper (2018). Unnatural phonology: a synchrony-diachrony interface approach. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Berko, Jean (1958). The child’s learning of English phonology. Word 14, 150–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette (2004). Evolutionary phonology: the emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette (2017). Between natural and unnatural phonology: the case of cluster splitting epenthesis. In Bowern, Claire, Horn, Laurence & Zanuttini, Raffaella (eds.) On looking into words (and beyond). Berlin: Language Science Press, 3–16.Google Scholar
Breiss, Canaan & Hayes, Bruce (2020). Phonological markedness effects in sentence formation. Lg 96, 338–370.Google Scholar
Broad, Rachel, Prickett, Brandon, Moreton, Elliott, Pertsova, Katya & Smith, Jennifer L. (2015). Emergent faithfulness to proper nouns in novel English blends. WCCFL 33, 77–78.Google Scholar
Donegan, Patricia J. & Stampe, David (1979). The study of Natural Phonology. In Dinnsen, Daniel A. (ed.) Current approaches to phonological theory. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club, 126–173.Google Scholar
Frellesvig, Bjarke (2010). A history of the Japanese language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, Stefan A. (2004). Language processing and segmental OCP. In Hayes et al. (2004), 346–371.Google Scholar
Frisch, Stefan A., Pierrehumbert, Janet B. & Broe, Michael B. (2004). Similarity avoidance and the OCP. NLLT 22, 179–228.Google Scholar
Garrett, Andrew & Johnson, Keith (2013). Phonetic bias in sound change. In Yu, Alan C. L. (ed.) Origins of sound change: approaches to phonologization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 51–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamada, Atsushi (1952). Hatsuon to dakuon to no sōkan-sei no mondai [The issues in the relation between moraic nasals and voiced obstruents]. Kokugo Kokubun 21, 18–32.Google Scholar
Hansson, Gunnar (2008). Diachronic explanations of sound patterns. Language and Linguistics Compass 2, 859–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1999). Phonetically driven phonology: the role of Optimality Theory and inductive grounding. In Darnell, Michael, Moravcsik, Edith, Noonan, Michael, Newmeyer, Frederick & Wheatley, Kathleen (eds.) Functionalism and formalism in linguistics, volume 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 243–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce, Kirchner, Robert & Steriade, Donca (eds.) (2004). Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce & Stivers, Tanya (2000). The phonetics of post-nasal voicing. Ms, University of California, Los Angeles. Available at https://linguistics.ucla.edu/people/hayes/Phonet/NCPhonet.pdf.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce & White, James (2013). Phonological naturalness and phonotactic learning. LI 44, 45–75.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce, Zuraw, Kie, Siptár, Péter & Londe, Zsuzsa (2009). Natural and unnatural constraints in Hungarian vowel harmony. Lg 85, 822–863.Google Scholar
Hirano, Takanori (2013). A rule application approach to rendaku. Paper presented at the International Conference on Phonetics and Phonology 2013, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Hora, Tomio (1952). Edo jidai no ippan shomin wa hatashite myōji o motanakatta ka [Is it really the case that commoners in the Edo period did not have surnames?]. Nihon Rekishi 50, 2–7.Google Scholar
Irwin, Mark, Miyashita, Mizuki, Russell, Kerri & Tanaka, Yu (2020). The rendaku database. Version 4.0. Available at http://www-h.yamagata-u.ac.jp/$\sim$irwin/site/Rendaku\_Database.html.Google Scholar
Ito, Junko & Mester, Armin (1986). The phonology of voicing in Japanese: theoretical consequences for morphological accessibility. LI 17, 49–73.Google Scholar
Ito, Junko & Mester, Armin (2003). Japanese morphophonemics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi (2013). Japanese: revised edition, number 17 in London Oriental and African Language Library. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaber, Aziz & Omari, Osama (2018). Proper name subcategory: a prominent position. Language Sciences 69, 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jodaigo Jiten Henshu Iinkai (ed.) (1967). Jidaibetsu kokugo daijiten Jōdaihen [The unabridged dictionary of the national language by age: Old Japanese]. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Katz, William F., Mehta, Sonya & Wood, Matthew (2018). Effects of syllable position and vowel context on Japanese /r/: kinematic and perceptual data. Acoustical Science and Technology 39, 130–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto (2006). A faithfulness ranking projected from a perceptibility scale: the case of voicing in Japanese. Lg 82, 536–574.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto (2008). Phonetic naturalness and unnaturalness in Japanese loanword phonology. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 18, 317–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto (2015). Can we use rendaku for phonological argumentation? Linguistics Vanguard 1, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto, Ono, Hajime & Sudo, Kiyoshi (2006). Consonant co-occurrence restrictions in Yamato Japanese. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 14, 27–38.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto & Sano, Shin-ichiro (2014a). Identity Avoidance and Lyman’s Law. Lingua 150, 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto & Sano, Shin-ichiro (2014b). Identity Avoidance and rendaku. In Kingston, John, Moore-Cantwell, Claire, Pater, Joe & Staubs, Robert (eds.) Proceedings of the 2013 Annual Meeting on Phonology. Washington, DC: Linguistic Society of America, 10 pp.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto & Sano, Shin-ichiro (2014c). Testing Rosen’s Rule and Strong Lyman’s Law. NINJAL Research Papers 7, 111–120.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto & Sano, Shin-ichiro (2016). Rendaku and Identity Avoidance: consonantal identity and moraic identity. In Vance & Irwin (2016), 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto & Zamma, Hideki (2016). Generative treatments of rendaku and related issues. In Vance & Irwin (2016), 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael J. & Kisseberth, Charles W. (1977). Topics in phonological theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kindaichi, Haruhiko ([1976] 2005). Rendaku no kai [An account of rendaku]. In Kindaichi Haruhiko chosakushū [Haruhiko Kindaichi collection], volume 6. Tokyo: Tamagawa Daigaku Shuppanbu, 583–614 [Originally published in 1976 in Sophia Linguistica 2:1–22].Google Scholar
Kindaichi, Haruhiko, Hayashi, Oki & Shibata, Takeshi (eds.) (1988). Nihongo hyakka daijiten [An encyclopaedia of the Japanese language]. Tokyo: Taishūkan.Google Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo (2005). Rendaku: its domain and linguistic conditions. In van de Weijer et al. (2005), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Brockhoff, Per Bruun & Christensen, Rune Haubo Bojesen (2017). lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labrune, Laurence (2012). The phonology of Japanese, The Phonology of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labrune, Laurence (2014). The phonology of Japanese /r/: a panchronic account. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 23, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyman, Benjamin (1894). The change from surd to sonant in Japanese compounds. In The Oriental Club in Philadelphia (ed.) Oriental studies: a selection of the papers read before the Oriental Club in Philadelphia 1888–1894. Boston: Ginn & Company, 160–176.Google Scholar
Martin, Alexander & Peperkamp, Sharon (2020). Phonetically natural rules benefit from a learning bias: a re-examination of vowel harmony and disharmony. Phonology 37, 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Andrew (2011). Grammars leak: modeling how phonotactic generalizations interact within the grammar. Lg 87, 751–770.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel E. (1987). The Japanese language through time. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John (1988). Feature geometry and dependency: a review. Phonetica 43, 84–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, Hideo Marc (2003). Old Japanese: a phonetic reconstruction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Miyake, Takeo (1932). Dakuonkō [An examination of voiced obstruents]. Onsei no Kenkyū 5, 135–190.Google Scholar
Moreton, Elliot (2012). Inter- and intra-dimensional dependencies in implicit phonotactic learning. Journal of Memory and Language 67, 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreton, Elliott. (2008). Analytic bias and phonological typology. Phonology 25, 83–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreton, Elliott & Pater, Joe (2012a). Structure and substance in artificial-phonology learning. Part I: Structure. Language and Linguistics Compass 6, 686–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreton, Elliott & Pater, Joe (2012b). Structure and substance in artificial-phonology learning. Part II: Substance. Language and Linguistics Compass 6, 702–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreton, Elliott, Smith, Jennifer L., Pertsova, Katya, Broad, Rachel & Prickett, Brandon (2017). Emergent positional privilege in novel English blends. Lg 93, 347–380.Google Scholar
Morioka, Hiroshi (2011). Myōji no nazo [The mysteries of surnames]. Tokyo: Chikuma Shobo.Google Scholar
Morita, Takeshi (1977). Nippo-jisho ni mieru goon-ketsugō-jō no ichi-keikō [A combinatorial tendency of sounds in Vocabulario da Lingoa de Iapam]. Kokugogaku 108, 20–29.Google Scholar
Motoori, Norinaga (1790–1822). Kojiki-den [Commentaries on the Kojiki, Records of Ancient Matters]. Nagoya: Eirakuya.Google Scholar
Myers, Scott & Padgett, Jaye (2014). Domain generalisation in artificial language learning. Phonology 31, 399–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakagawa, Yoshio (1966). Rendaku, rensei (kashō) no keifu [A genealogy of sequential voicing and sequential unvoicing (working label)]. Kokugo Kokubun 35, 302–314.Google Scholar
Nishimura, Kohei (2003). Lyman’s Law in loanwords. Master’s thesis, Nagoya University.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. John (1981). The listener as a source of sound change. In Masek, Carrie S., Hendrick, Roberta A. & Miller, Mary Frances (eds.) Papers from the parasession on language and behavior: Chicago Linguistic Society, May 1–2, 1981. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society, 178–203.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1993). The phonetics of sound change. In Jones, Charles (ed.) Historical linguistics: problems and perspectives. London: Longman, 237–278.Google Scholar
Ohta, Shinri (2015). Onin-teki/imi-teki yōin ga rendaku ni ataeru eikyō: rendaku dētabēsu to rojisutikku kaiki bunseki o riyō shita kenkyū [The effects of phonological and semantic factors on rendaku: a study using a rendaku database and logistic regression analyses]. On’in Kenkyū 18, 85–92.Google Scholar
Pater, Joe (1999). Austronesian nasal substitution and other NC effects. In Kager, René, van der Hulst, Harry & Zonneveld, Wim (eds.) The prosody–morphology interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 310–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Michael J. D. (2009). The BOBYQA algorithm for bound constrained optimization without derivatives. Technical Report NA06, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge. Available at https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/na/NA\_papers/NA2009\_06.pdf.Google Scholar
Pycha, Anne, Nowak, Pawel, Shin, Eurie & Shosted, Ryan (2003). Phonological rule-learning and its implications for a theory of vowel harmony. WCCFL 22, 101–114.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2021). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 4.1.2. Available at https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Ramsey, Robert & Unger, Marshall (1972). Evidence for a consonant shift in 7th century Japanese. Papers in Japanese Linguistics 1, 279–295.Google Scholar
Rosen, Eric (2001). Phonological processes interacting with the lexicon: variable and non-regular effects in Japanese phonology. PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Rosen, Eric (2003). Systematic irregularity in Japanese rendaku: how the grammar mediates patterned lexical exceptions. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 48, 1–37.Google Scholar
Rosen, Eric (2016). Predicting the unpredictable: capturing the apparent semi-regularity of rendaku voicing in Japanese through Gradient Symbolic Computation. BLS 42, 235–249.Google Scholar
Sakata, Satoshi (2006). Myōji to namae no rekishi [History of surnames and given names], Rekishi Bunka Library. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kobunkan.Google Scholar
Sano, Shin-ichiro (2015). Universal markedness reflected in the patterns of voicing process. NELS 45, 49–58.Google Scholar
Sato, Hirokazu (1989). Fukugō-go ni okeru akusento kisoku to rendaku kisoku [Accent rules and rendaku rules in compounds]. In Kōza nihongo to nihongo kyōiku 2: Nihongo no onsei, on’in (jō) [Japanese and Japanese teaching 2: Japanese phonetics, phonology 1]. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin, 233–265.Google Scholar
Shirooka, Keiji & Murayama, Tadashige (2011). A database of Japanese surnames and their rankings. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10297/00025667.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer (2011). Category-specific effects. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.) The Blackwell companion to phonology, volume 4. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2439–2463.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer L. (2014). Prototypical predicates have unmarked phonology. In Kingston, John, Moore-Cantwell, Claire, Pater, Joe & Staubs, Robert (eds.) Proceedings of the 2013 Annual Meeting on Phonology. Washington, DC: Linguistic Society of America, 8 pp.Google Scholar
Sugito, Miyoko (1965). Shibata-san to Imada-san: tango no chōkakuteki benbetsu ni tsuite no ichi kōsatsu [Shibata-san and Imada-san: an examination of auditory distinction of words]. Gengo Seikatsu 165, 64–72.Google Scholar
Sugito, Miyoko (1982). Kinki hōgen-ni okeru za-gyōon, da-gyōon, ra-gyōon no kondō ni tsuite [Perceptual confusions of /z/, /d/, and /r/ in Kinki dialects]. In Iitoyo, Kiichi, Hino, Sugezumi & Sato, Ryoichi (eds.) Kōza hōgengaku [Courses in dialectology], volume 7. Tokyo: Tosho Kankokai, 299–325.Google Scholar
Suzaki, Haruo (1999). A private on-line database of 120,000 Japanese family names. Available at https://suzaki.skr.jp/index40.html.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Keiichiro (1998). A typological investigation of dissimilation. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Takayama, Michiaki (1992). Rendaku to renjōdaku [On sequential voicing and sequential post-nasal voicing]. Kuntengo to Kunten Shiryō 88, 115–124.Google Scholar
Takemura, Akiko, Pellard, Thomas, Hwang, Hyun Kyung & Vance, Timothy J. (2019). Rendaku in place names across Japanese dialects. Reports of the Keio Institute of Cultural and Linguistic Studies 50, 79–89.Google Scholar
Tamaoka, Katsuo, Ihara, Mutsuko, Murata, Tadao & Lim, Hyunjung (2009). Effects of first-element phonological-length and etymological-type features on sequential voicing (rendaku) of second elements. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 25, 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Shin’ichi & Kubozono, Haruo (1999). Nihon-go no hatsuon kyōshitsu: riron to renshū [A course in Japaense pronunciation: theory and practice]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Yu (2017). Phonotactically-driven rendaku in surnames: a linguistic study using social media. WCCFL 34, 519–528.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Yu (2020). Testing Rosen’s Rule yet again: an experimental study. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 27, 355–364.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Yu & Sugawara, Ayaka (2018). Revisiting accent in Japanese given names: stem-like accent with foot faithfulness. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 88, 217–228.Google Scholar
Toda, Ayako (1988). Wago no hi-rendaku kisoku to rendaku keikō: Nippo Jisho to Waei Gorin Shūsei kara [The rendaku-inhibiting rules and tendencies for rendaku application in native Japanese words: an examination of the Vocabulario da Lingoa de Iapam and Hepburn’s Japanese-English and English-Japanese Dictionary]. Dōshisha Kokubungaku 30, 80–98.Google Scholar
Toyoda, Takeshi ([1971] 2012). Myōji no rekishi [The history of surnames] [Originally published in 1971 by Chuo Koronsha]. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kobunkan.Google Scholar
Tsuzuki, Masaki & Lee, Hyun-Bok (1992). A phonetic study of the Korean and Japanese lateral, flap and nasal. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.) Proceedings of the 1992 Seoul International Conference on Linguistics. Seoul: Koryo University, 761–780.Google Scholar
Ueda, Kazutoshi (1898). Gogaku sōken: p-on-kō [A new linguistic perspective: on the sound /p/]. Teikoku Bungaku 4, 41–46.Google Scholar
Unger, J. Marshall (2004). Alternations of m and b in Early Middle Japanese: the deeper significance of the sound-symbolic stratum. Japanese Language and Literature 38, 323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unger, Marshall (1977). Studies in Early Japanese morphophonemics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
van de Weijer, Jeroen, Nanjo, Kensuke & Nishihara, Tetsuo (eds.) (2005). Voicing in Japanese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vance, Timothy J. (2005). Sequential voicing and Lyman’s Law in Old Japanese. In Mufwene, Salikoko S., Francis, Elaine J. & Wheeler, Rebecca S. (eds.) Polymorphous linguistics: Jim McCawley’s legacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 27–43.Google Scholar
Vance, Timothy J. (2007). Have we learned anything about rendaku that Lyman didn’t already know? In Frellesvig, Bjarke, Shibatani, Masayoshi & Smith, John Charles (eds.) Current issues in the history and structure of Japanese. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers, 153–170.Google Scholar
Vance, Timothy J. (2008). The sounds of Japanese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vance, Timothy J. (2014). If rendaku isn’t a rule, what in the world is it? In Kabata, Kaori & Ono, Tsuyoshi (eds.) Usage-based approaches to Japanese grammar: towards the understanding of human language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vance, Timothy J. (2015a). Rendaku. In Kubozono, Haruo (ed.) The handbook of Japanese phonetics and phonology, number 2 in Handbooks of Japanese Language and Linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 397–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vance, Timothy J. (2015b). Rendaku no fukisokusei to Rōzen no hōsoku [Rendaku’s irregularities and Rosen’s Rule]. NINJAL Research Papers 9, 207–214.Google Scholar
Vance, Timothy J. & Asai, Atsushi (2016). Rendaku and individual segments. In Vance & Irwin (2016), 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vance, Timothy J. & Irwin, Mark (2013). A rendaku database for Old Japanese. Paper presented at the 21st International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Oslo.Google Scholar
Vance, Timothy J. & Irwin, Mark (eds.) (2016). Sequential voicing in Japanese: papers from the NINJAL Rendaku Project. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vance, Timothy J., Kaneko, Emiko & Watanabe, Seiji (eds.) (2017). Rendaku no kenkyū [Research on rendaku]. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Vance, Timothy J., Kawahara, Shigeto & Miyashita, Mizuki (2021). The diachronic origins of Lyman’s Law: evidence from phonetics, dialectology and philology. Phonology 38, 479–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, James (2014). Evidence for a learning bias against saltatory phonological alternations. Cognition 130, 96–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, Colin (2006). Learning phonology with substantive bias: an experimental and computational study of velar palatalization. Cognitive Science 30, 945–982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamaguchi, Yoshinori (1988). Kodai-go no fukugō-go ni kansuru ichi-kōsatsu: rendaku o megutte [A study of compounds in Old Japanese: on rendaku]. Nihongogaku 7, 4–12.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira (1998). Identity avoidance in phonology and morphology. In LaPointe, Steven G., Brentari, Diane K. & Farrell, Patrick M. (eds.) Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 216–246.Google Scholar
Zamma, Hideki (2005). The correlation between accentuation and rendaku in Japanese surnames: a morphological account. In van de Weijer et al. (2005), 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamma, Hideki & Asai, Atsushi (2017). Sei ni mirareru Sugitō no hōsoku to kakuchō-ban Raiman no hōsoku ni kansuru keitai-teki/onin-teki kōsatsu [Morphological and phonological analyses of Sugito’s Law and Strong Lyman’s Law in surnames]. In Vance et al. (2017), 147–179.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jie & Lai, Yuwen (2010). Testing the role of phonetic knowledge in Mandarin tone sandhi. Phonology 27, 153–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka supplementary material
Tanaka supplementary material
File
149.8 KB